Hunter is an Intellectual Property attorney. He clerked for two and a half years at Erise IP, P.A. during law school prior to starting full-time and is approaching the end of his third full year full-time. In total, Hunter has spent approximately five and a half years in the IP law profession. The following is his […]
https://www.patenteducationseries.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/Hunter-Horton.jpg19531302Editorial Staffhttps://www.patenteducationseries.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/logo-centric-bw.pngEditorial Staff2021-01-12 08:03:082020-08-22 13:42:33Hunter A. Horton, Intellectual Property Attorney at Erise IP
Question: According to the PDF titled ‘Amendments to the Rules of Practice for Trials Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board’, what are sufficient grounds for a post-grant review? Answer: 37 CFR 42.208 (C) states that Post-grant review shall not be instituted for a ground of unpatentability unless the Board decides that the petition supporting […]
https://www.patenteducationseries.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/mpep-podcast-art-800.jpg800800Editorial Staffhttps://www.patenteducationseries.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/logo-centric-bw.pngEditorial Staff2021-01-05 08:03:332020-08-22 13:42:33MPEP Q & A 214: What are Sufficient Grounds for Post-Grant Review?
Adam is a Founding Member of Aeon Law, an Intellectual Property law firm. Adam has worked in the IP law profession for the last 25 years. The following is his Q & A interview. Why did you think this would be a good career for you? IP law is one of the most positive forms of […]
https://www.patenteducationseries.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/AEON-Attorney-Pics-Adam-LK-Philipp.jpg20001500Editorial Staffhttps://www.patenteducationseries.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/logo-centric-bw.pngEditorial Staff2020-12-29 08:03:442020-08-22 13:42:33Adam L.K. Philipp, Founding Member of Aeon Law
Question: Can attorney arguments take the place of evidence? Answer: No, the arguments of counsel cannot take the place of evidence in the record. Examples of attorney statements which are not evidence and which must be supported by an appropriate affidavit or declaration include statements regarding unexpected results, commercial success, solution of a long-felt need, […]
https://www.patenteducationseries.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/mpep-podcast-art-800.jpg800800Editorial Staffhttps://www.patenteducationseries.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/logo-centric-bw.pngEditorial Staff2020-12-22 08:03:582020-08-22 13:42:33MPEP Q & A 213: Can Attorney Arguments Take the Place of Evidence?
Clifford is a Patent Attorney who has been working in the IP profession since September 2014. From September 2014 until May 2016 Clifford was working on the patent prosecution side of patent law. In May 2016, Clifford moved to his current position at Erise IP, focusing on IP litigation. The following is his Q & A […]
https://www.patenteducationseries.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/cliff_brazil.jpg28581905Editorial Staffhttps://www.patenteducationseries.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/logo-centric-bw.pngEditorial Staff2020-12-15 08:03:392020-08-22 13:42:33Clifford Thomas Brazen, Patent Attorney at Erise IP
Question: According to the PDF titled ‘Amendments to the Rules of Practice for Trials Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board’, what is the number of days before an oral argument for the exchange of exhibits? Answer: The number of days before an oral argument for the exchange of exhibits is at least 7 days. […]
https://www.patenteducationseries.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/mpep-podcast-art-800.jpg800800Editorial Staffhttps://www.patenteducationseries.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/logo-centric-bw.pngEditorial Staff2020-12-08 08:03:382020-08-22 13:42:33MPEP Q & A 212: What is the Number of Days Before an Oral Argument for Exchange of Exhibits?
Ted is an IP attorney and partner at Berkeley Law & Technology Group LLP, headquartered in Portland, Oregon. He has worked in the field of intellectual property law since 2001. The following is his Q & A interview. How did you get into a career in IP law? My first job out of law school […]
https://www.patenteducationseries.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/Ted-Karr-partner.jpg150120Editorial Staffhttps://www.patenteducationseries.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/logo-centric-bw.pngEditorial Staff2020-12-01 08:03:152020-08-22 13:42:33Ted D. Karr, IP Attorney & Partner at Berkeley Law & Technology Group LLP
Question: When may an abandoned application be used as prior art? Answer: An abandoned patent application may become evidence of prior art only when it has been appropriately disclosed, as, for example, when the abandoned patent [application] is reference[d] in the disclosure of another patent, in a publication, or by voluntary disclosure under former Defensive […]
https://www.patenteducationseries.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/mpep-podcast-art-800.jpg800800Editorial Staffhttps://www.patenteducationseries.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/logo-centric-bw.pngEditorial Staff2020-11-24 08:03:392020-08-22 13:42:33MPEP Q & A 211: When May an Abandoned Application be Used as Prior Art?
Covid-19 has caused enormous stress and trauma to our society and unfortunately, the strain doesn’t seem like it will end in 2020. I very much hoping that things will start to look up in 2021, but depending on when in 2021, it could still be a while. So I’d like to talk briefly about the […]
https://www.patenteducationseries.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/pes-patent-bar-review.png347746Editorial Staffhttps://www.patenteducationseries.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/logo-centric-bw.pngEditorial Staff2020-11-17 08:03:252020-08-22 16:15:29Covid-19 and the Patent Bar
Question: What is the executive summary of the PDF titled ‘Amendments to the Rules of Practice for Trials Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board’? Answer: This final rule amends the existing consolidated set of rules relating to the United States Patent and Trademark Office (Office or USPTO) trial practice for IPR, PGR, CBM, and […]
https://www.patenteducationseries.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/mpep-podcast-art-800.jpg800800Editorial Staffhttps://www.patenteducationseries.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/logo-centric-bw.pngEditorial Staff2020-11-10 08:03:302020-08-22 13:42:33MPEP Q & A 210: What is the Executive Summary of the Supplement ‘Amendments to the Rules of Practice for Trials Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board?
Hunter A. Horton, Intellectual Property Attorney at Erise IP
/in Practitioner Career /by Editorial StaffHunter is an Intellectual Property attorney. He clerked for two and a half years at Erise IP, P.A. during law school prior to starting full-time and is approaching the end of his third full year full-time. In total, Hunter has spent approximately five and a half years in the IP law profession. The following is his […]
MPEP Q & A 214: What are Sufficient Grounds for Post-Grant Review?
/in MPEP Q and A Podcast /by Editorial StaffQuestion: According to the PDF titled ‘Amendments to the Rules of Practice for Trials Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board’, what are sufficient grounds for a post-grant review? Answer: 37 CFR 42.208 (C) states that Post-grant review shall not be instituted for a ground of unpatentability unless the Board decides that the petition supporting […]
Adam L.K. Philipp, Founding Member of Aeon Law
/in Practitioner Career /by Editorial StaffAdam is a Founding Member of Aeon Law, an Intellectual Property law firm. Adam has worked in the IP law profession for the last 25 years. The following is his Q & A interview. Why did you think this would be a good career for you? IP law is one of the most positive forms of […]
MPEP Q & A 213: Can Attorney Arguments Take the Place of Evidence?
/in MPEP Q and A Podcast /by Editorial StaffQuestion: Can attorney arguments take the place of evidence? Answer: No, the arguments of counsel cannot take the place of evidence in the record. Examples of attorney statements which are not evidence and which must be supported by an appropriate affidavit or declaration include statements regarding unexpected results, commercial success, solution of a long-felt need, […]
Clifford Thomas Brazen, Patent Attorney at Erise IP
/in Practitioner Career /by Editorial StaffClifford is a Patent Attorney who has been working in the IP profession since September 2014. From September 2014 until May 2016 Clifford was working on the patent prosecution side of patent law. In May 2016, Clifford moved to his current position at Erise IP, focusing on IP litigation. The following is his Q & A […]
MPEP Q & A 212: What is the Number of Days Before an Oral Argument for Exchange of Exhibits?
/in MPEP Q and A Podcast /by Editorial StaffQuestion: According to the PDF titled ‘Amendments to the Rules of Practice for Trials Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board’, what is the number of days before an oral argument for the exchange of exhibits? Answer: The number of days before an oral argument for the exchange of exhibits is at least 7 days. […]
Ted D. Karr, IP Attorney & Partner at Berkeley Law & Technology Group LLP
/in Practitioner Career /by Editorial StaffTed is an IP attorney and partner at Berkeley Law & Technology Group LLP, headquartered in Portland, Oregon. He has worked in the field of intellectual property law since 2001. The following is his Q & A interview. How did you get into a career in IP law? My first job out of law school […]
MPEP Q & A 211: When May an Abandoned Application be Used as Prior Art?
/in MPEP Q and A Podcast /by Editorial StaffQuestion: When may an abandoned application be used as prior art? Answer: An abandoned patent application may become evidence of prior art only when it has been appropriately disclosed, as, for example, when the abandoned patent [application] is reference[d] in the disclosure of another patent, in a publication, or by voluntary disclosure under former Defensive […]
Covid-19 and the Patent Bar
/in Patent Bar /by Editorial StaffCovid-19 has caused enormous stress and trauma to our society and unfortunately, the strain doesn’t seem like it will end in 2020. I very much hoping that things will start to look up in 2021, but depending on when in 2021, it could still be a while. So I’d like to talk briefly about the […]
MPEP Q & A 210: What is the Executive Summary of the Supplement ‘Amendments to the Rules of Practice for Trials Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board?
/in MPEP Q and A Podcast /by Editorial StaffQuestion: What is the executive summary of the PDF titled ‘Amendments to the Rules of Practice for Trials Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board’? Answer: This final rule amends the existing consolidated set of rules relating to the United States Patent and Trademark Office (Office or USPTO) trial practice for IPR, PGR, CBM, and […]